Silversmit et al. also lay out the fitting parameters for the V 2p spectra[4,5]. These results are based on spectra from a series of standard samples (V2O5 (single crystal cleaved in vacuum), VO2 (2 separately supplied powders pressed into a pellet, argon ion sputtered), and V2O3 (powder pellet, argon ion sputtered) using a Perkin-Elmer Phi ESCA 5500 equipped with a monochromatic Al Ka source. The authors give FWHM values for both V 2p3/2 and 2p1/2 for V2O3 along with the V 2p3/2 FWHM for VO2 but fail to provide values for other species. Subsequent correspondence with the author[6] provided further FWHM details and these are provided in Table 3.
The binding energy values presented in Table 3 are charge corrected to oxygen 1s set to 530.0eV while the values in Table 2 are corrected C 1s at 284.8 eV. If the spectra from the reference samples anaylsed here are corrected to O 1s at 530.0 eV, very similar values are obtained (eg. V 2p3/2 for V(V) = 517.16 eV "0.01 eV and V(IV) = 515.6 eV "0.07 eV from this work compared to 517.2 eV and 515.8 eV for Silversmit et al., respectively). This may indicate that 530.75"0.1 eV may be a more suitable O 1s reference value (in line with C 1s at 284.8 eV) for mixed vanadium systems. Correction to oxygen only works when the bulk of the sample is a vanadium oxide. In systems where vanadium is a minor oxide component, charge correction to adventitious carbon would be a superior choice. It may also be possible to correct to the a strong V(V) peak or a well defined V(0) peak if they are present in the sample.
Peak fitting parameters assembled from the three sets of data (Tables 1, 2 and 3) were used to fit this spectra from the V(II) oxide sample (Figure 1), clearly showing it is a mix of species and not pure V(II) oxide. A Shirley background extended to include the O 1s portion of the spectrum is used here and appears to give a reasonable result except for a slight “underfitting” of the 2p1/2 portion of the spectrum (i.e. some area of peak not accounted for). If a Shirley background is applied across only the V 2p portion of the spectrum a much more severe “overfit” of 2p1/2 portion of the spectrum is found. On comparison of a number of different vanadium samples it appears that the previous option is preferable, given a better fit than the latter. It may be possible using a background offset on the higher binding energy portions to further improve the fit of the 2p1/2 portion, however the improvement in quantification, based on the 2p3/2 portion of the spectrum, will be marginal at best.
It should also be noted that V2O5 degrades slowly under the X-ray beam to V(IV) compounds. Using a 210 W source (15 mA, 14 kV) and a timed set of scans, upwards of 8 to 10% conversion of V(V) to V(IV) was found. This should also be taken into account during any analysis of vanadium compounds [2].
Expanded discussion on this work is found in reference [2].
A CasaXPS ready example of multiple vanadium species can be found at the link.

Figure 1. V 2p (and O 1s) spectrum of a mixed vanadium oxide sample [2].

Table 1. Literature values (from [1]) for V 2p3/2 spectra.


References:
[1] C.D. Wagner, A.V. Naumkin, A. Kraut-Vass, J.W. Allison, C.J. Powell, J.R.Jr. Rumble, NIST Standard Reference Database 20, Version 3.4 (web version) (http:/srdata.nist.gov/xps/) 2003.
[2] M.C. Biesinger, L.W.M. Lau, A.R. Gerson, R.St.C. Smart, Resolving Surface Chemical States in XPS Analysis of First Row Transition Metals, Oxides and Hydroxides: Sc, Ti, V,Cu and Zn, Applied Surface Science, 257 (2010) 887-898.
[3] R.P. Gupta, S.K.Sen, Calculation of multiplet structure of core p –vacency levels. II, Physical Review B, 12(1) (1975) 12-19.
[4] G. Silversmit, D. Depla, H. Poelman, G.B. Marin, R. De Gryse, Determination of V2p XPS binding energies for different vanadium oxidation states (V5+ to V0+), Journal of Electron Spectroscopy and Related Phenomena, 135 (2004) 167-175.
[5] G. Silversmit, D. Depla, H. Poelman, G.B. Marin, R. De Gryse, An XPS study on the surface reduction of V2O5(001) induced by Ar+ ion bombardment, Surface Science, 600 (2006) 3512-3517.
[6] G. Silversmit, Ghent University, Personal Communication, (2007).